Canon Rf 16 Vs 28. Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review PCMag p.1 #15 · Canon RF Primes vs 16-28 F2.8 IS STM nightnight wrote : Some years ago, Roger Cicala (founder of LensRentals and all around optics wizard) made the assertion that even very cheap primes outperformed pro zooms at equivalent apertures and focal lengths when comparing resolution; e.g., a Canon 50 1.8 at 2.8 would beat the pro level 24. On the telephoto end, the new Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM has better center performance and corner performance for contrast and resolution
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM review big viewing angle, small price Digital Camera World from www.digitalcameraworld.com
Press ↵ Enter for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press ↵ Enter for Keyboard Navigation; Press ↵ Enter for Accessibility menu. Compare Canon RF 16mm f 2.8 STM Lens vs Canon RF 28mm f 2.8 STM Lens Canon RF vs Canon RF 14-35mm f 4 L IS USM Lens vs Canon RF 16-28mm f 2.8 IS STM Lens Canon RF
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM review big viewing angle, small price Digital Camera World
So I have the R7 with 18-105mm kit lens but I still feel the need to have prime lenses. RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens comparison shows the 16-28 weighing just over half as much and measuring considerably less The 16-28 has far less peripheral shading, including at f/11, modestly less flare effects, and considerably stronger geometric distortion
Canon RF 28mm F2.8 STM Lens Review. Compare Canon RF 16-28mm f 2.8 IS STM Lens Canon RF vs Canon RF 28-70mm f 2.8 IS STM Lens Canon RF vs Canon RF 24-50mm f 4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Canon RF vs Canon RF 15-30mm f 4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Press ↵ Enter for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Now we get into the "unfair" comparisons where the new RF 16-28mm f/2.8 costs considerably less than its "L" professional brothers.
Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review PCMag. p.1 #15 · Canon RF Primes vs 16-28 F2.8 IS STM nightnight wrote : Some years ago, Roger Cicala (founder of LensRentals and all around optics wizard) made the assertion that even very cheap primes outperformed pro zooms at equivalent apertures and focal lengths when comparing resolution; e.g., a Canon 50 1.8 at 2.8 would beat the pro level 24. On the telephoto end, the new Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM has better center performance and corner performance for contrast and resolution